Google Books history came from an idea by Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page to access a large collection of books in digital format, which could then be searched and compared to value a book’s “relevance and usefulness by tracking the number and quality of citations from other books” (Google). Their mission is to “make the world’s information as universally accessible and useful as possible, all the while respecting publishers, copyright and the role of libraries across the globe” (Google). In 2026, the program now allows people to search for, read and download over 10 million free books, through partnerships with Partner Program and the Library Project (Google). While the search rewards users with millions of free books, Google benefits from advertising and as a pioneer they were receiving media attention already. Traction increased with fast and simple ways to buy books whose copyright restrictions did not allow them to be posted for free. Through their partnership, University of Michigan became “the most digital research library in the world” (Marcum et. al. 75) and in turn, Google “used the digitized books in developing and training various artificial intelligence algorithms” (Marcum et al. 76) Google announced Google Scholar shortly after.
While Google’s
initial interest in digitalizing books seemingly came from having the same goal
as libraries – to make as much information as possible, as accessible as
possible, I cannot believe their intentions were altruistic. I believe this
practice of making information accessible was really a trojan horse for
improving their algorithms and tracking history because now they can access
everything users search for, read and for how long. User privacy is a
fundamental issue for libraries “Everyone has the right to privacy and
confidentiality in their library use, no matter their origin, age, background,
or views. When users recognize or fear that their privacy is at risk, they lose
the freedom to explore ideas.” (ALA) And yet, Google used establishments of
free thinking like the University of Michigan Library – to digitalize their
collection with the dangled carrot of offering users more information and
freedom to grow intellectually, only to store, categorize and collet data on
these very same users. Google’s enterprise is so vast that competition isn’t
really competition at all, so even if other more public-focused digital
libraries were to compete, with more accurate methods of categorizing and
labelling information to better benefit its users – I fear that they would be
dead in the water before they even began.
Google is now a
worldwide name and has power in a variety of markets, including a leading
search engine. It fools its users into thinking it is offering the very best in
information. However, just like the Library of Congress declined a coalition
with Google (Marcum et. al. 76), through concerns of copyright infringement and
quality of scans, amongst other things – it is smart to be skeptical.
Algorithms are estimates and assumptions, anticipating what it thinks its users
want, versus users searching in a library with the assistance of a library
worker who is ensuring the validity and credibility of the material being
found. Google leads you to believe that its books are good value for money at
free or discounted prices – but it takes much more from you than simply your
money.
To further this,
Andreas Ekström gave a TEDx talk titled, “The
moral bias behind your search results.” which discusses the dangers of
relying on a search engine to give you credible information.
Works
Cited
“About
Google Books.” Google Books, www.google.com/googlebooks/about/index.html.
Accessed 4 April 2026.
Ekström,
Andreas. “The moral
bias behind your search results.” YouTube, uploaded by TEDx
Talks, January 2015. https://www.ted.com/talks/andreas_ekstrom_the_moral_bias_behind_your_search_results
“Google
Books History.” Google Books, www.google.com/googlebooks/about/history.html.
Accessed 4 April 2026.
Marcum,
Deanna B, and Roger C Schonfeld. Along Came Google: A History of
Library Digitization. Princeton University Press, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691208039.
“Privacy:
An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights.” ALA, www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill/interpretations/privacy.
Accessed 4 April 2026.

Comments
Post a Comment