.png)
Prompt: "Google books"
Google Books claims to be the largest library out there. On its front page it says, "Search the world's most comprehensive index of full-text books." So as a first time user of google books, I wanted to see for myself. I googled some of my favorite titles and genres to explore their options. I felt some mixed results depending on your goals in searching.
Google books is a streamlined, basic resource for book exploration but maybe not as a creditable academic one. It's clean, easy to understand, and if the full text isn't available for certain titles(which makes sense for copyright laws) there are tabs for purchase options, "Publisher Collections", "More by Author" sections, and "Similar Books" sections for the user to browse and utilize. According to an author redditor, it is also directly connected to ChatGPT recommendations as well which is helpful for independent authors to get noticed easier(Fayet 2026).
There are thousands of titles available when searching by genre or keywords that can feel like transversing a sea of content. Alternatively it just feels like a different formatted google search engine, which isn't necessarily bad but can feel like google painting you a different source when it is the same one. Google, as a whole, isn't the search engine it used to be, it is a marketed funded source that tends to push content with a dollar (Friedman2010)and provide free to use resources that often feel like bloat content to make search results a larger number. I know this sounds skeptical but there are several credited academic articles that can back this up saying that even the full text free resources provided by Google Books are pushing copyright laws(Baksik2006, Ng&Ong2010, & Friedman2010).
Overall, I find Google Books is a source like anything on the internet but I don't find this as a credible academic source on its own. Similarly, this feels like researching how using GoogleScholar can be used as a resource but not necessarily a peer reviewed academic one when directly compared to databases(Kyong&Colón-Aguirre2019). If you want a free direct glossary of book recommendations, Google Books is a good free resource. However, libraries already do this too.
References:
Baksik, Corinna. “Fair Use or Exploitation? The Google Book Search Controversy.” Portal: Libraries & the Academy, vol. 6, no. 4, Oct. 2006, pp. 399–415. EBSCOhost, https://doi-org.palomar.idm.oclc.org/10.1353/pla.2006.0047.
Fayet, Ricardo"ricardofayet". r/KDP - Kindle Direct Publishing. Reddit. link accessed 9 May 2026. https://www.reddit.com/r/KDP/comments/1p25jfj/why_you_shouldnt_sleep_on_the_google_books_library/
Friedman, Rachel R. “No Confusion Here: Proposing a New Paradigm for the Litigation of Keyword Advertising Trademark Infringement Cases.” Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, vol. 12, no. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 355–96. EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=20547045-1a3a-39cb-b841-dd204b1d3c14.
Google Books. link accessed 9 May 2026. https://books.google.com/
Kyong Eun Oh, and Mónica Colón-Aguirre. “A Comparative Study of Perceptions and Use of Google Scholar and Academic Library Discovery Systems.” College & Research Libraries, vol. 80, no. 6, Sept. 2019, pp. 876–91. EBSCOhost, https://doi-org.palomar.idm.oclc.org/10.5860/crl.80.6.876.
Ng, Anna Maria Karla B., and Allan Verman Y. Ong. “The Google Books Search: The Changing Frontiers of Copyright Law.” Ateneo Law Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, Mar. 2010, pp. 982–91. EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=be85876f-1cf9-3de5-9e30-6cbb94fa0b98.
Comments
Post a Comment